Laudable as the effort of Punch Newspapers to bring this malady to the national discuss might be, it is nonetheless laced with a typical stereotype which tends to classify women as "vectors" of diseases and not rightly as humans who have been abused, often by men who are mindless and in actual sense are vectors of human failure, depravation and low life. The following statement in the Punch Editorial: "But more frightening is the health hazards such sexually harassed female detainees pose to the wider society when freed. Certainly, they become agents for the spread of sexually transmitted diseases such as HIV/AIDS, gonorrhoea and syphilis. Other contagious ailments such as tuberculosis and cholera easily spread" is ill informed and most unfortunate.
Punch Editorial should be educated that "more frightening" is the impunity of those in authority who abuse their power and violate the vulnerable; "more frightening" is a society which has become unsafe for everyone of us; "more frightening" is the savagery and inhumanity in our midst; "more frightening" is the complacency of the entire society which has failed to hold people to account and firmly demand for justice; "more frightening" is the lack of support services for survivors of sexual violence; and "more frightening" is the absence of appropriate forensic medicine service for the management of the survivors, and for collection of forensic medical evidence for the justice system. These and more are the "more frightening" situations that an informed Punch Editorial should have been concerned about, rather than the apparent re-victimization of already traumatized women in that poorly conceived statement which is dripping from a poisonous gravy of female stereotype as sexual objects that are "vectors" of diseases following sexual assault. This has been responsible for the stigmatization and continuing violence that survivors of sexual assault experience in our society. Punch Newspaper should withdraw that unfortunate statement and correct a wrong impression which has devalued a beautiful case the paper has tried to make for the respect of human dignity in their Editorial page of this day.
No comments:
Post a Comment